Unstructured Observations

Entries from September 2007

Journalism is Mass Attention Engineering: Unethical.

September 29, 2007 · 3 Comments

I always had this fantasy that with the development of social networks some traditional -and in my view very evil industries (e.g. Traditional media and jounalism) would go extinct. Recently I found out that day is not very far.

But first, Let me explain why I think professions like journalism are in nature immoral . The rationale for such -some may say harsh- thinking is that the public media puts too much power at the hands of few “editors” to control the attention of the society. To filter the news and with it our attention.

One might say that we all control one anothers flow of attention but it’s very different from when someone is doing it for a living. to steal from Sinclare I can say It’s hard to expect a journalist not to abuse his power by engineering readers attention when his salary depends upon abusing it. To be honest, Journalism is nothing more than delicate attention engineering. Editor ship is nothing but arranging news items in a newspaper page. I’ve worked in a news paper. It works that way.

But what do I mean by engineering attention and why is it so important to me. It is so important because one can not think about anything unless s/he pay attention to it . Or – and more importantly- if one doesn’t pay attention to something s/he will not think about it. This statement has a darker side to it and that is, if you can manage the attention of public you can make them think about what you want them to think about. I know, all Journalists are not evil but this quality is in the nature of journalism. Even I publishing this humble blog in this corner of digital world am doing it. If I am successful and you are reading this sentence then I have riveted your attention and I am taking your line of thought with me. It’s not important if you agree with me or not the matter is that you are thinking about this post. Let me make an example. Try not thinking about big pink elephant! Why I think journalism will die?

Now why do I think the death of journalism is so close? A while ago a report was published by the Project for Excellence in Journalism (PEJ). The first four paragraphs of the report speaks for itself:

http://www.journalism.org/node/7493

If someday we have a world without journalists, or at least without editors, what would the news agenda look like? How would citizens make up a front page differently than professional news people?If a new crop of user-news sites—and measures of user activity on mainstream news sites—are any indication, the news agenda will be more diverse, more transitory, and often draw on a very different and perhaps controversial list of sources, according to a new study.

The report, released by the Project for Excellence in Journalism (PEJ), compared the news agenda of the mainstream media for one week with the news agenda found on a host of user-news sites for the same period.

In a week when the mainstream press was focused on Iraq and the debate over immigration, the three leading user-news sites—Reddit, Digg and Del.icio.us—were more focused on stories like the release of Apple’s new iphone and that Nintendo had surpassed Sony in net worth, according to the study.” [more]

The study concludes that Digg (founded 2003), del.icio.us (founded 2004) and Reddit (founded 2005) focus on more trivial items of news when compared to 48 mainstream news outlets. Let me tell you what, The first news paper was published in 1594! (ref) I should say what a triumph for PEJ!

[on the side: As I was typing this I came a cross this post on Particles (R) blog. this is the poll on CNN's front page a few days ago.

Cnn front page poll

I guess PEJ had a lucky week for their experiment.

[Clarification: I am not saying journalism is evil and should be for example banned. It's a beast we need to examine government records and issues of our world. It's necessary for traditional democracy. It has certain privileges. Reporters can examine secret government records. To be honest the social news websites are more focused on trivial items of news but think of a time when the 20-somethings who tag or digg in these websites become 40-something professionals. That is my Idea of Earth 2.0. Things will change. that is for sure.]

Categories: Attention Engineering · Economics of attention · Technology

The Parallel Ahmadinejad

September 26, 2007 · 1 Comment

I’ve spent a substantial fruitless amount of time trying to understand why Ahmadinejad says things that he says, up until now! Recently, he said:

President Ahmadinejad in Columbia University

“In Iran we don’t have homosexuals like in your country (USA). […] In Iran we do not have this phenomenon. I don’t know who’s told you that we have this.” [Yahoo][NY Times][CNN]

Many thought he said that to gloss over the fact that homosexuals are executed in Iran. Many are wrong. I know why he says things like that. Read these quotes from him before I make my argument:

• We thank God that our enemies are idiots. (6 February 2006) [Source]

• The world is rapidly getting ‘Ahmadinejadized,’ if I’m allowed to make a joke. (20 November 2006 (Source(s): [Source 1], [Source 2])

• I went to a couple of real state agencies in my neighborhood and checked. Home prices have not risen at all where I live(About 6 months ago when home prices nearly doubled in Tehran.).

And, of course, my favorite:

“I’ve been informed of a 16 year old Iranian girl who has created nuclear energy in her home with the tools she bought off the market.” I talked to her teacher. She is now a nuclear scientist. (Link to Video on youtube)

Why do you think that happens?

I have been convinced there is only one possible way to explain it. It’s called the “Parallel Universe Theory of Ahmadinejad“. The guy lives in a totally different world. I know it’s hard to believe but this seems to be the only sound explanation and scientific method says when there is only one possible explanation to a phenomena then there is only one possible explanation.

When you imagine him living in a parallel universe, his words start making sense. He says there are no homosexuals in Iran because in the parallel-Iran there are no homosexuals. Members of his cabinet and all the people around him( what a pity Wikiquote has no page on those guys) live in the same universe. Anyway, the parallel universe that he lives in has the following attributes:

1. has no homosexuals.
2. no inflation or price increase either.
3. no homosexuals “parallel” U.S.A
4. Homosexuality is a taboo in “parallel” Earth.
5. Homosexuals are not people.

How do they switch universes is unknown. Well, if there were more quantum physicists.

[Background: As I am writing this the Iranian government news is on and it's quoting Fox news to say Ahmadinejad's Speech in Columbia university was an absolute success. I am convinced that I ,too, am living in a parallel universe. Strange one too. ]

Categories: General Nonesense · Iran · Mahmoud Ahmadinejad · World

Posts Deleted

September 23, 2007 · Leave a Comment

I had to delete a couple of my last posts due to the increasing traffic of this page and ,well, crimethink.

Categories: Metalog